Top 5 Python Libraries for Parsing HTML and XML
Expert cornerDiscover our top 5 Python libraries choice for parsing HTML and XML. Find comparisons and recommendations for beginners.


Eugenijus Denisov
Key Takeaways
-
Choose the right tool: for speed, use lxml. For ease of use, go with BeautifulSoup.
-
A good scraper builds a parse tree, uses CSS selectors, and relies on a solid parsing library, not regular expressions.
-
Write simple Python code, experiment with different libraries, and try building small scrapers first.
When working with data on the web, it rarely comes clean. Websites serve content in HTML or XML, both of which are built for browsers, not for your data analysis convenience. However, HTML or XML parsing tools can help.
Parsing means analyzing the structure of a web page to extract the data you need, such as titles, links, prices, or something else.
It’s essential in web scraping and automation because it turns raw markup into readable and usable data. If you want to make sense of messy tags, nested elements, or hidden attributes, a Python parse library is your best bet, and we’ll show you 5 of those we think are most useful.
BeautifulSoup
BeautifulSoup is a favorite among beginners and professionals. It reads broken HTML easily and provides simple methods to locate and parse the information you need.
Pros:
- Easy syntax for navigating a parse tree.
- Works well with CSS selectors.
- Handles messy HTML effortlessly.
Cons:
- Slower than other options.
- Requires an external parser, such as lxml or html5lib.
It’s an excellent option for basic scraping tasks where you want clean and readable Python code. It comes out like this:
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
html = "<div><p>Hello</p></div>"
soup = BeautifulSoup(html, "html.parser")
print(soup.p.text)
BS4 uses a parser module under the hood, and builds a parse tree you can explore with ease. It also integrates well with Python’s re module, which allows you to use regular expressions to extract or match patterns from parsed content.
Unlike a parser generator, BeautifulSoup doesn’t require grammar rules or token definitions.
lxml
lxml is a fast and powerful library that builds on the strengths of C libraries for high performance.
Pros:
- Super fast.
- Full support for XPath and CSS selectors.
- Builds a solid parse tree.
Cons:
- Doesn’t have parser generator capabilities.
- Syntax isn’t as friendly for beginners.
It’s ideal for complex scraping tasks where speed and flexibility matter more than syntax. It looks like this:
from lxml import html
tree = html.fromstring("<p>Hello</p>")
print(tree.xpath('//p/text()')[0])
When building a scraper for a heavy and complex web scraping project, lxml is one of your best options. It’s especially useful when you want to avoid messy regular expressions and stick to structured parsing.
While it’s not a parser generator, it still offers complex parse tree navigation without building one from scratch.
html.parser
It’s the default parser that comes with the Python module. Since html.parser is part of the standard library, no additional installations are needed.
Pros:
- Always available (standard in every Python version).
- Simple to use.
- Easy integration with other Python libraries.
Cons:
- Struggles with malformed HTML.
- Fewer features compared to other parsers.
It’s best for lightweight projects or in cases where external libraries are less used. Here’s a sample Python code:
from html.parser import HTMLParser
class MyParser(HTMLParser):
def handle_data(self, data):
print("Data:", data)
parser = MyParser()
parser.feed("<p>Hello</p>")
It uses event-driven parsing and calls handler methods for each tag or piece of data, but does not build a parse tree by default. Also, since it comes with the Python interpreter, it’s always ready to go.
For complex scraping, it lacks the essential tools (such as tree navigation or CSS selectors), so workarounds with regular expressions may become messy or inefficient.
Even though it’s not a parser generator, it can still interpret markup without a formal grammar.
html5lib
html5lib is known for accuracy and reliability. It parses the same way a browser does, following the full HTML5 spec.
Pros:
- Handles broken HTML like a browser.
- Reliable and thorough.
- Works well with CSS selectors when used through BeautifulSoup.
Cons:
- Very slow.
- Heavy on memory.
- Not a parser generator.
It’s ideal when accuracy matters a lot more than speed. It looks like this when used through BeautifulSoup:
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
html = "<div><span>Hi</span></div>"
soup = BeautifulSoup(html, "html5lib")
print(soup.span.text)
You’ll often use html5lib behind the scenes when you’re strict about parsing rules. It’s ideal for high-accuracy web scraping and produces a browser-like parse tree, which differs from the abstract syntax tree used in compilers.
Using regular expressions here would break more often due to unpredictable tag layouts. html5lib closely mimics how modern browsers parse HTML, making it reliable for handling messy or non-standard markup.
PyQuery
PyQuery brings jQuery-style syntax to Python. It’s built for developers who love fast, compact code with CSS selectors.
Pros:
- Familiar to jQuery users.
- Easy element selection with CSS selectors.
- Decent speed.
Cons:
- Not as widely supported.
- Fewer updates than others.
- Doesn’t work with parser generator tools.
It’s best for projects where compact syntax and web development speed are essential. Here’s a Python code example:
from pyquery import PyQuery as pq
doc = pq("<div><p>Hello</p></div>")
print(doc("p").text())
With PyQuery, you’ll feel like you’re writing jQuery inside Python, which is neat for developers who prefer front-end style. Also, it builds a DOM-like parse tree using lxml under the hood, even though its interface remains minimal and jQuery-style.
Brief Comparison of All 5 Libraries
Library | Speed | Ease of use | Accuracy | Best feature |
---|---|---|---|---|
BeautifulSoup | Medium | High | Medium | Clean parse tree |
lxml | High | Medium | High | XPath support |
html.parser | High | High | Low | Always available |
html5lib | Low | Medium | Very high | Browser-like parsing |
PyQuery | Medium | High | Medium | jQuery-style syntax |
Which One Should You Use as a Beginner?
If you’re just starting out, go with BeautifulSoup. It has a clear syntax, works with various parsers, such as html.parser or lxml, and helps you focus on learning the basics of parse tree building and CSS selectors.
As you continue, it’s helpful to understand the difference between structured parsing with tools like BeautifulSoup or lxml, and simpler techniques, such as using regular expressions.
While regular expressions can be helpful for extracting patterns from text, proper parsers give you more control and reliability when working with nested or messy HTML.
Conclusion
The best tool depends on the complexity and needs of your project. Parsing is a core concept in every programming language, not just in web scraping.
For messy or nested HTML, structured parsers like BeautifulSoup or lxml offer far more reliability than regular expressions. Start with simple tools, then experiment with more advanced ones as needed.
If your project evolves into working with custom data formats or programming language source code, understanding parser generators can be a useful next step.